<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:34:05 GMT--><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><title>Journal</title><subtitle>Journal</subtitle><id>http://mattreich.net/journal/</id><link rel="alternate" type="application/xhtml+xml" href="http://mattreich.net/journal/"/><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mattreich.net/journal/atom.xml"/><updated>2012-02-17T00:17:27Z</updated><generator uri="http://www.squarespace.com/" version="Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/)">Squarespace</generator><entry><title>iMessage Beta: My Thoughts</title><category term="Apple"/><category term="Apps"/><category term="FaceTime"/><category term="Technology"/><category term="iMessage"/><id>http://mattreich.net/journal/2012/2/16/imessage-beta-my-thoughts.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mattreich.net/journal/2012/2/16/imessage-beta-my-thoughts.html"/><author><name>Matt Reich</name></author><published>2012-02-17T00:12:45Z</published><updated>2012-02-17T00:12:45Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>Today Apple dropped a bomb and announced a new update coming to OS X this summer called <a href="http://www.apple.com/macosx/mountain-lion/">Mountain Lion</a>. Mountain Lions are both cool and a bit scary so I'm thinking that's where this update may stand, but we'll see.</p>

<p>We've all been expecting tighter integration between OS X and iOS and this appears to be a huge step in that direction. One of the applications that I've always thought would make the most sense in that connected state was iMessage. iChat is really a pretty awful application and the fact that it has remained essentially untouched for years is a good indicator that Apple has thought the same thing.</p>

<p>Today you are able to <a href="http://www.apple.com/macosx/mountain-lion/features.html#messages">download the beta</a> of iMessage for your Mac if you want to give it a try. Of course I grabbed it right away. I've been messing with it today and here are my initial day one thoughts. They're a bit mixed, but this is a beta version so a lot of these things could certainly change before final release so keep that in mind.</p>

<h3>It's All Blurry</h3>

<p>The line between texting, chatting, video calling, etc. is blurring. This is good, I think. It's a little strange and is taking some getting used to, but essentially iMessage appears to have the ability to sync message with all your devices. </p>

<p>If someone sends you an iMessage to an email address you have connected to iMessage (your Apple ID perhaps) that message will go to your Mac if you have iMessage open and it will also go to your iPhone. If you retrieve the message on either device the new message notification is gone on the other. </p>

<p>Nice, but sitting at a coffee shop with my phone on the table next to me and iMessage open on my Mac I get double notification for each message. It's kind of annoying actually. I'm sure the people sitting around me are super impressed that my phone keeps vibrating and I just keep ignoring it. A little notification customization may fix this, but I haven't found a way to pull it off just yet. </p>

<p>Also, if someone sends an iMessage to your iPhone number then you'll only receive that on your phone. Is that bad you ask? I don't know. Probably not, but that sort of un-blurs the line a bit. </p>

<p>A big positive to this is the ability to continue conversations through multiple devices. If I'm using iMessage on my Mac and need to leave the computer I can seamlessly continue the conversation on my iPhone without anyone knowing the difference. </p>

<h3>Only Apple-ites</h3>

<p>Now being able to text from the Mac is a big selling point for iMessage. That's awesome, but it only works with other Apple users. Specifically iMessage users. This isn't a major deal to me as a majority of the people I text heavily are iPhone users, but it puts some heavy restriction on its functionality and still forces me to use different services and methods for communicating with different people. That's a pain in the ass. </p>

<h3>Video and No Voice, I think</h3>

<p>iChat was able to do voice calls, which believe it or not I used from time to time. I'm not seeing a method for conducting a voice call with iMessage which bums me out a bit. </p>

<p>Video calls can be made via FaceTime which makes sense I think. Again, these are restricted to Apple users.</p>

<p>It seems like Apple is viewing FaceTime as the future of phone calls and that is probably a valid prediction. </p>

<h3>Final Thoughts of iMessage Beta</h3>

<p>So far I think it's pretty great, but for some reason it still doesn't feel quite right to me. It's not connecting the dots for me like I was hoping it would. </p>

<p>I've been thinking about this and to be honest I can't really figure out exactly what would be the ideal situation for me. I like some of the things that iMessage does and then others I don't. This is probably a good indicator that Apple is wandering off into uncharted territories once again. I don't even know what I want. Maybe I'll realize it if/when I get it. For now I guess it's cool to see something in a completely different direction (or multiple directions).</p>

<p>The restriction to only Apple users does kind of suck. If iMessage could be more open on some level it would immediately become at least twice as cool. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FaceTime#Standards">FaceTime</a> was built on open video standards but Apple still restricts its usage. Maybe there's hope of that service as well as iMessage opening up a bit the future.</p>

<p>Overall, it's fun to see some of the drastic things that Apple has in mind. They've got a pretty good track record of changing the way we do things. We'll see if they can pull it off again. For now, color me cautiously skeptical.</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>I Like Demos</title><category term="App Store"/><category term="Apps"/><category term="Bitching"/><category term="Technology"/><id>http://mattreich.net/journal/2012/2/9/i-like-demos.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mattreich.net/journal/2012/2/9/i-like-demos.html"/><author><name>Matt Reich</name></author><published>2012-02-10T00:23:05Z</published><updated>2012-02-10T00:23:05Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>I'm not a huge gamer, but I own an Xbox 360. I'll dabble from time to time, but it's turned into my primary Netflix watching device. A huge interface update was released a couple months ago and recently I decided I should probably expand beyond my Netflix watching and scope out what else this streaming video machine can do.</p>

<p>I went into the games area and did some wandering. The one thing that I thought was so great was the demo or trial feature available on most of the games. I've always had that problem with Xbox games. They're so damn expensive that it's hard to swallow a $50 purchase to just try one out. So after losing my Blockbuster card I just quit paying attention (yeah, that's a joke...I still have it...ok, that's a joke too). Reviews are great, but I like to try stuff out and I don't like to pay a large sum to try something out either. I end up just avoiding something I could potentially love.</p>

<p>I really wish the iOS App Store, and even more so, Mac App Store would figure out a way to easily allow for demos like my Xbox does. There's a lot to be said about a demo. Have you ever caught yourself staring at the $9.99 purchase button on the App Store entry of an application you think you'd love, but just aren't completely sure, trying to figure out if it would be worth it, bouncing back and forth between reviews, only to end up deciding it probably isn't worth it? Or is it? No, probably isn't. But what if it is? It could save you 30 seconds a day. Ok, probably not worth it. </p>

<p>Yeah, me neither.</p>

<p>Developers offer demos of their applications outside of the Mac App Store all the time. It's nearly standard practice. The Mac App Store seems like a perfect way to manage demos. It handles new installs and re-installs and updates just fine. Why not demos? </p>

<p>I do a lot of <a href="http://mac.appstorm.net/author/mattreich/">application reviewing</a> and as the App Store takes a bigger hold it's getting more and more difficult to find demos of the applications I want to try out. No, &quot;lite&quot; version on the App Store don't count. That's cheating.</p>

<p>I was going to say I think I'd end up with a lot more applications, but the reality is that I'd probably have about the same amount, but they'd be ones that I actually used. I've purchased several apps over the years where I can say had there been a demo for me to try I wouldn't have purchased. So maybe bad developers wouldn't make as much money? </p>

<p>Well, this is going nowhere. I can't really find much of a point in here other than I think there should be demo capability built in the Mac App Store so this is essentially just a bitch session. Sorry. Thanks for listening though.</p>

<p>Oh, and if you know someone that works at Apple see what you can do. Also, an OS X bluetooth update would be nice too. That thing really pissed me off the other day too. Thanks. </p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Journaling with Chronories</title><category term="750 Words"/><category term="Lifestyle"/><category term="journaling"/><category term="writing"/><id>http://mattreich.net/journal/2012/2/8/journaling-with-chronories.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mattreich.net/journal/2012/2/8/journaling-with-chronories.html"/><author><name>Matt Reich</name></author><published>2012-02-08T15:00:13Z</published><updated>2012-02-08T15:00:13Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>I wrote a bit ago about my searching for a journaling application. I've found a lot of benefit from writing every day and wanted to combine this with also documenting my days. There are lots of application options with varying feature sets, but I ended up <a href="http://mattreich.net/journal/2012/1/11/journaling-app-journey.html">settling on Chronories</a>.</p>
<p>A big reason I ended there was because the application does all sorts of behind the scenes data collection. So even if I didn't actually sit down and write every day the app would still compile some data. So I've been using <a href="http://www.syniumsoftware.com/chronories/">Chronories</a> for a little better than a month now. My results have been a bit mixed.</p>
<p>First off, my <a href="http://mattreich.net/journal/2012/1/4/a-new-year-a-new-life.html">change in lifestyle</a> has thrown me out of a regular routine and I'm still working on settling into a less structured day. It's pretty obvious that this has resulted into less personal writing as I haven't written in Chronories nearly as regularly as I was planning to (hopefully I can change that in the days ahead).</p>
<p>Today for the first time since I started using the app, I took a quick spin through the automatically generated reports. Even though I haven't written much there is still some pretty cool data in there. Even a just month of data was pretty interesting to look back on. I'm really looking forward to seeing what it looks like in six months or a year.</p>
<p>So, I guess it seems like my choice of app is doing what I hoped it would. I could neglect the whole idea of "journaling" and it would still grab some interesting data about my days that I could analyze later. That said, I am missing the <a href="http://mattreich.net/journal/2011/10/18/750-words.html">benefits of writing each day</a> so I do plan to do that more often going forward.</p>
<p>Chronories probably isn't for everyone, but it's working pretty damn well for me so far. Hopefully I'll be able to do a bit more manual entry into it in the coming months and I think that will add even more interestingness to the reports. We'll see. Maybe I'll post some examples of these reports down the road where I've got a few months of data to look at.</p>
<p>At this point it's safe to say the app is doing what it's supposed to, but I am not.</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Opinion Entitlement</title><category term="5by5"/><category term="Commenting"/><category term="Opinions"/><category term="Web"/><id>http://mattreich.net/journal/2012/2/6/opinion-entitlement.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mattreich.net/journal/2012/2/6/opinion-entitlement.html"/><author><name>Matt Reich</name></author><published>2012-02-06T15:00:20Z</published><updated>2012-02-06T15:00:20Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>It's interesting how many people, when communicating (that's a loose term in a lot of situations) on the Web become almost an entirely different person. All of a sudden the need to share opinions rears its ugly head. I think it's pretty obvious that this is both a good thing and a bad thing. It'd be hypocritical of me to say otherwise. After all, you're reading my opinion right here. What I want to talk about is the almost resentment for those that intentionally close off the avenue for opinions to be shared.</p>
<p>I was listening to a recent episode of the <a href="http://mattreich.net/journal/2011/9/15/the-5by5-model.html">5by5</a> podcast called <a href="http://5by5.tv/b2w">Back to Work</a>. In it this topic comes up briefly and <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/hotdogsladies">Merlin Mann</a> and <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/danbenjamin">Dan Benjamin</a> discuss specifically how <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/gruber">John Gruber</a> is essentially hated by some people and a primary reason is that they feel like he shuts them off to sharing their opinions. Gruber doesn't allow comments on his popular blog <a href="http://daringfireball.net">Daring Fireball</a>. He writes about what he wants to and essentially never gets into any sort of online back and forth argument that so many people on the Web just love. This makes people mad. Some people.</p>
<p>The issue is that people feel like they are entitled to this sharing of opinion. This is certainly a new phenomenon that came along with blogging and Facebook and Twitter and all that good stuff. Think about the time before these technologies and ease of sharing. Someone wrote an opinion article and published it in a book or a magazine or a newspaper and that was it. The piece was maybe discussed amongst friends at the local pub.</p>
<p>A Web discussion is often a fantastic method to connect people with interesting viewpoints from all over the world and to have an intelligent, insightful, respectful discussion about a particular item. That is good and the way it works a lot of the time. The bad are those loud, sharp-toned commenters and opinion sharers who are essentially yelling into a conversation for real good reason other than to be assholes.</p>
<p>I don't blame Gruber for not allowing comments on his blog. He'd get slammed with these types of "opinions" because of the nature of his writing. He is successful and opinionated and that no doubt rubs some people the wrong way. When the option to share is turned off, certain people are enraged at this perceived lack of respect. The reality is that he has every right to close it off.</p>
<p>For the sake of everyone, if you're going to comment on post anywhere on the Web try to add some value to the conversation. There's no need to be an ass and it pisses me off when your stupid comments show up when I'm Google-searching for fedoras.</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>I've Found a Purpose for "Check-ins"; Excitement Ensues</title><category term="Apps"/><category term="Check-ins"/><category term="Foursquare"/><category term="Lifestyle"/><category term="iPhone"/><id>http://mattreich.net/journal/2012/2/2/ive-found-a-purpose-for-check-ins-excitement-ensues.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mattreich.net/journal/2012/2/2/ive-found-a-purpose-for-check-ins-excitement-ensues.html"/><author><name>Matt Reich</name></author><published>2012-02-02T22:55:59Z</published><updated>2012-02-02T22:55:59Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>That title may be a little strange depending upon where you live, your technological prowess or you desire to let the world know what you're doing every waking moment of your life. Check-ins and status updates are an extremely common activity and I've struggled to figure out the need and desire to do this, but I think I may have discovered an actual use. I know, exciting isn't it?</p>
<p>I've relocated recently from a small town to Chicago and after doing this I decided to take another look at the whole status updates thing and with that I decided to throw in checking-in to places as well. While the status update thing has been still a bit of a mystery to me at this point (I'm not giving up yet), I think I have found a legitimate use (or even two) for checking-in.</p>
<p>When I talk about checking-in, I'm referring specifically to <a href="https://foursquare.com/">foursquare</a>. I know there are other applications in the field and even Facebook now includes such a feature, but foursquare was there first, so my I pledge my geek allegiance to them (first at least).</p>
<p>I've had the <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/foursquare/id306934924?mt=8">iPhone app</a> for some time on my phone and I think I used it once just to check it out more or less. The last couple weeks I've used it quite regularly to simply keep track of the restaurants, bars and coffee shops I go to. Chicago (and any large city for that matter) has essentially an endless crop of establishments and I feel that it is my duty to check out as many as possible and then document which are the best (by my standards). I guess it makes sense to document ones that suck too so I don't make the same mistake twice. No need for that yet, but there could be.</p>
<p>In the small town where I came from this could be done quite easily in my head. Not so much here. I haven't repeated a venue since I've been here and the list of places to try grows faster than my wallet can keep up with. And there's something (probably a defect) in my personality that likes to keep track of things like this.</p>
<p>I've also chosen to send my check-ins to Twitter. To be honest, I always thought this was a bit annoying when seeing these in the stream from other people, but I'm only using it for checking-in to certain locations so it won't get as spammy I don't think. And as a side effect I get a little more action in my Twitter stream (<a href="http://mattreich.net/journal/2012/1/4/on-status-updates.html">still working on that</a>). You won't see me checking into bus stops or trains or my house or anything like that. That's still dumb.</p>
<p>Foursquare includes some other functionality that is quite cool. I'm making lists of places I've been so I can stay better organized and I'm also utilizing the explore feature to find and get to new places. In fact, I found the coffee shop I'm writing this from via that feature.</p>
<p>The app is great, which is really helpful in getting me to use it, plus I derive some genuine functionality from it. I think it'll maintain its space as a regularly used app for me while I'm living in a big city. So, I'm now on board with check-ins. At least partially.</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Journaling App Journey</title><category term="Apps"/><category term="Chronories"/><category term="Journal"/><category term="Lifestyle"/><id>http://mattreich.net/journal/2012/1/11/journaling-app-journey.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mattreich.net/journal/2012/1/11/journaling-app-journey.html"/><author><name>Matt Reich</name></author><published>2012-01-11T15:00:26Z</published><updated>2012-01-11T15:00:26Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>Writing a personal journal hasn't been something that I've always done. Even recently I wouldn't say that I've actually been journaling, but rather just writing each day. I've been doing <a href="http://mattreich.net/journal/2011/10/18/750-words.html">750 Words</a> writings nearly every day for the better part of the last year. While the theory behind these is to do a brain dump in the morning to clear your mind for the day, these entries have turned into more of a journal that I write at some point during the day. At some point I realized there really wasn't a whole lot of value in returning to previous entries. That's part of the process of these writings, but I felt like I could get more out of it. I enjoy the metrics (totally accurate or not) that are automatically generated and there are some methods to track some other more custom metrics. I tried this for a while as there were some other things I wanted to track, but I quickly fell out of that habit.</p>
<p>With my <a href="http://mattreich.net/journal/2012/1/4/a-new-year-a-new-life.html">new lifestyle</a> I decided to try out an actual journaling application. There are many options in the field and the three I zeroed in on were <a href="http://www.marinersoftware.com/products/macjournal/">MacJournal</a>, <a href="http://dayoneapp.com/">Day One</a>, and <a href="http://www.syniumsoftware.com/chronories/">Chronories</a>.&nbsp;</p>
<p>MacJournal is very well regarded and after some research seemed to be a little more robust than I really needed. Day One and Chronories were the two finalists in my mind. Those were appealing for very different reasons. Day One is a barebones, impeccably designed journaling application that also has accompanying iPhone and iPad apps. Chronories is what you might call a new-age journaling application. It utilizes technology to accumulate data as well as allowing actual journal writing.</p>
<p>These are two areas that appeal to me. I love minimal, focused applications like Day One and I'm also really interested in the self-analysis Chronories would allow. After more deliberation than was healthy, I decided on Chronories. In the end I thought it would be most interesting to track some data about myself as a I embark on a career change and a big lifestyle change.&nbsp;</p>
<p>I'm only a couple days into using Chronories, but here's a basic rundown of it's capabilities. Each day's entry is contstructed from a combination of automatically compiled data along with a little manual intervention. After a bit of configuration and adjustment, Chronories can record things like the music you've been listening to in iTunes, the people you've emailed and chatted with, the temperature where you're at, your mood, the applications you've been using and several other other things. Some of these items can be manually added to and tweaked to record exact what you're looking for. Along with all of this there is also a space for an actual written journal entry.</p>
<p>Some standard report type views are set up so that after you've accumulated some data you can look back not only from an entry by entry point of view (calendar view), but also from many other angles. You could correlate your mood to the temperature for example. That sounds pretty cool to me and the process to completing an entry seems quite easy considering the amout of info that is recorded.</p>
<p>Regardless of what application or method you use a journal is only useful if you actually use it. We'll see how Chronories goes, but the combination of automatic and manual entry should make the process easier. More on this as my journaling continues on this year.&nbsp;</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>A New Year, A New Life</title><category term="Lifestyle"/><category term="Personal"/><id>http://mattreich.net/journal/2012/1/4/a-new-year-a-new-life.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mattreich.net/journal/2012/1/4/a-new-year-a-new-life.html"/><author><name>Matt Reich</name></author><published>2012-01-04T18:46:49Z</published><updated>2012-01-04T18:46:49Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>As is common this time of the year we reflect on the year past and also what is on the horizon. This year, I find myself in a considerably different place. As of December 31st, 2011 I resigned from my postition as a Communication Technician for a financial instutition (a job I've held for more than seven years). &nbsp;</p>
<p>I began in the profession right out of college. I went from intern right into a full-time position with no time in between. I was lucky. I found a job that I liked for a good company right out of college. There are many folks these days who are forced to compromise too much in order to just make ends meet. For that I am grateful.</p>
<p>When I started, I also made the mental note that if I ever started to lose interest or if some other (perhaps even risky) opportunity arose I wouldn't hesitate to make a change. Life is too short. You can't become stagnate. I didn't want to become one of those drones in the corporate world who zombie-walked to work each day just because it was safe. That's an easy thing to tell yourself, especially fresh out of college, and I can tell you from experience, something entirely different when your faced with that situation.</p>
<p>As I look back now this was a long time coming, but I felt like I needed a few things to line up to make my departure to something &nbsp;different possible. And by "possible" I mean a level of risk I was willing to shoulder. I probably stuck it out longer than I should have, but now that we're past that point I'm glad that I did. The situation is right and the time is now. I'm sure of that.</p>
<p>The change is in process as we speak. I've decided to make a move to Chicago to do some work with a friend on a new business (more on this in the coming months). I've done some freelance Web development work the last couple years and wanted to spend more time in that field. I'll be doing work for my friend in this area as well along with taking on some other projects as I'm able.&nbsp;</p>
<p>I've also decided to take my <a href="http://mattreich.net/work/">freelance writing</a> more seriously. I guess that primarily just means writing more. I was nearly writing at capacity with the limited time that I had, but now I have the opportunity to grow in that area and take on more work. I love writing so this is a really exciting prospect. Along with more contract work I'll also be writing more here. The topics will be varied, but all within my interest range. I plan to document my experiences (a bit at least) over the coming year here as well so check back if you're interested. We'll see where it ends up, but I think good things will come of it</p>
<p>There are all sorts of other things that go along with this major change and I'm struck with a nervous excitment to take them on. Life is all about experiences so regardless of what side of the fence this next year falls on I can safely say this will be an extremely intersting one and one that I'm excited to tackle.</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>On Status Updates</title><category term="Facebook"/><category term="Path"/><category term="Twitter"/><category term="Web"/><id>http://mattreich.net/journal/2012/1/4/on-status-updates.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mattreich.net/journal/2012/1/4/on-status-updates.html"/><author><name>Matt Reich</name></author><published>2012-01-04T16:00:37Z</published><updated>2012-01-04T16:00:37Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>I've been wrestling with how best to use Facebook and Twitter (and all other social network type applications for that matter) for some time. I see the validity in connecting with people using these tools, but I still somehow get lost in their functionality.</p>
<p>I think I've narrowed it down to the nature of a status update. The early days of Twitter and Facebook and the whole "what are you doing?" type of question these applications were asking encouraging you to share has always been odd to me. I never totally got on board with that and to be quite honest I've thought it somewhat presumptuous for people to think that I actually care that they just ate a great tuna sandwich (or whatever). In that same mindset I always feel strange posting anything like that because I don't want to spam all of my "friends" with some largely pointless statement.</p>
<p>I know that there are a lot of people that find those little snippets great. They allow others a small peak into your life. The point where I see relevance or usefulness here is when dealing with close friends and family. There are situations where it's cool to have that small window into a loved one's life and vice versa. I'm moving to a new city very soon and I know that my folks would (or at least my mom) enjoy that type of information.</p>
<p>For me, controlling those that I share with and that share with me is probably the most important aspect. I typically only follow people on Twitter that I think add some value to me life. This doesn't have to be anything profound and a lot of people are certainly hit and miss, but this could be anything from a link to a good article or a joke or a beautiful photo. These are all at different points on the value scale, but I do see some value in sharing those types of things and I'll unfollow anyone who I think turns up on the low end of the scale too often. Facebook has added <a href="http://www.facebook.com/about/sharing">more and more features</a> that allow me to better manage the noise. To be frank, I have a lot of "friends" that are long lost acquaintances at best. Granted, every once in a great while I may need to send a message to one of these people, but I really don't want that window into their lives. It bothers me more often that not actually.</p>
<p>I find more focused applications like <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/path/id403639508?mt=8">Path</a> kind of interesting because these restrictions are built in from the start. It's designed to be a more closed sharing community. This has more appeal to me and I think to those interested in what I'm doing as well. I'm more apt to share things I may see as pointless, but my mom may find useful in that type of environment.</p>
<p>Oddly enough, I'll probably end up sharing this post on Twitter and I suppose that's an indicator that I feel like it does contribute some (although probably pretty minimal) value to the community. This is a wandering, experimental exploration for me still and I may venture one direction or another on the value scale as I go along. I certainly don't think I'm right or wrong, I'm merely trying to figure out how the noise that are status updates fit into my world.</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Next Generation Apple TV</title><category term="Apple"/><category term="Apple TV"/><category term="Technology"/><id>http://mattreich.net/journal/2012/1/2/next-generation-apple-tv.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mattreich.net/journal/2012/1/2/next-generation-apple-tv.html"/><author><name>Matt Reich</name></author><published>2012-01-03T01:19:55Z</published><updated>2012-01-03T01:19:55Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>The rumor mill that works around Apple products is hardcore (arguably to a fault) and correct probably less than 50% most of the time. I don't have any specific data to back up that claim, but that's just the feeling I get. As many times as I think the rumors are completely off base and just dumb, I'll admit, I still follow them quite closely. The rumor of late, the next generation Apple TV.</p>
<p>Jobs was quoted in Walter Isaacson's biography, as saying "I've cracked it" when talking about the Apple TV. Since that came to light there has been much speculation about the next generation of this device.</p>
<p>It now stands as a set top device and that has always made a lot of sense to me. The flexibility to connect to many different displays is a huge plus factor in my eyes. Along with that Apple still has the ability to control the environment and all while keeping the price point pretty darn low. The one thing you could argue is wrong with this is the control of the actual display. Is that crucial to the Apple TV viewing experience? I'd say, not really. A display with an HDMI connection will be plenty capable of creating a solid experience.</p>
<p>The current speculation is that the next iteration of the Apple  TV will in fact be completely integrated with the display. Essentially like an iMac where the entire device is all bundled up in one package. I don't know if this makes sense for the reverse of the reasons I think the set top idea does make sense. While the control of the entire experience would be something right up Apple's alley, I think the price point will just be too great and a total 180 from their current strategy in that market. A 37" display with integrated Apple TV would have to come in at well over $2000 wouldn't it? Considering they sell the current generation set top box for $99 that seems crazy to me. Maybe we'll see both options offered. I wold argue there's a pretty solid chance of that happening actually.</p>
<p>I wonder if Jobs' comment that he "had cracked it" was maybe referring more to the software and licensing side of this device. Looking at iTunes, I can only imagine ridiculous amount of work done behind the scenes with record labels that we never heard much about. Getting record labels on board with the idea was a huge aspect to getting it to actually work and also to making iPods and now iPhones and iPads to be as successful as they are. One step further we could say that it was an industry changer. Couldn't we be looking at some similar arrangements with television and movie studios here? Couldn't that be where Jobs cracked it? Seems pretty likely there will be some major advancements in this area.</p>
<p>Whatever the new generation ends up as, I will say that I'm excited about it. Apple has been known to shake up entire industries and I'm sure they're just chomping at the bit to get at another one.</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Greed</title><category term="Greed"/><category term="Money"/><category term="Politics"/><id>http://mattreich.net/journal/2011/12/5/greed.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mattreich.net/journal/2011/12/5/greed.html"/><author><name>Matt Reich</name></author><published>2011-12-06T00:00:28Z</published><updated>2011-12-06T00:00:28Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>I read an <a href="http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/2011/11/the_7_trillion_secret_loan_program_the_government_and_big_banks_should_be_punished_for_deceiving_the_public_about_their_hush_hush_bailout_scheme_.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+farukates+%28FarukAt.es%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader">article</a> at Slate recently regarding a secret $7 trillion loan program that was extended to big banks during the financial crisis and it got me thinking.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The total numbers are staggering: $7.7 trillion of credit&mdash;one-half of  the GDP of the entire nation. $460 billion was lent to J.P. Morgan, Bank  of America, Citibank, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs, and Morgan Stanley  alone&mdash;without anybody other than a few select officials at the Fed and  the Treasury knowing. This was perhaps the single most massive  allocation of capital from public to private hands in our history, and  nobody was told. This was not TARP: This was secret Fed lending.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Greed is at the heart of all of our financial problems right now. The participants of this secret loan program absolutely profited from it. To a scary degree. Selfishness, hipocracy and greed are everywhere you turn when looking at the current financial woes of our country (and of the world for that matter). Business and political decisions are made purely on the basis of their ability to impact the bottom line for a very select few at the very top.</p>
<p>Wealth equals power when you have greed on both ends of a transaction. Big banks don't want financial regulation that actually protects average citizens (The 99%) in place because then they wouldn't be able to put as much cash in their pockets. Big Banks throw money at our politicians to "lobby" them to make sure such citizen protection controls never see the light of day. Politicians don't care what is actually right for the American people because they enjoy being wealthy and want to get re-elected. And wouldn't you know, money is a huge asset when running a political campaign. We're in this constant downward spiral of screwing the American people all in the name of aiding a very small number (The 1%) in their efforts get insanely rich. Greed clouds judgement.</p>]]></content></entry></feed>
